Future donations are intended to contribute to future signed drivers, hosting and to possibly rent a virtual private server on which the team should be able to build a "real" online-update feature for future releases of PeerBlock. Hosting, as well as the signed driver, is funded by donations from the public. PeerBlock is under development by a small team of developers led by Mark Bulas. When the PeerGuardian project ended, its developer Phoenix Labs encouraged current PeerGuardian users to migrate to PeerBlock. It adds support for 32- and 64-bit Windows Vista, Windows 7, and Windows 8. PeerBlock 1.0 is based on the same code as PeerGuardian 2 RC1 Test3 Vista version. PeerBlock mainly uses blacklists provided by. It blocks incoming and outgoing connections to IP addresses that are included on blacklists (made available on the Internet), and to addresses specified by the user. PeerBlock is the Windows successor to the software PeerGuardian (which is currently maintained only for Linux). PeerBlock is a free and open-source personal firewall that blocks packets coming from, or going to, a maintained list of black listed hosts. Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients.As a firewall is crucial for your net security, PeerGuardian rightfully deserves to be dumped on the digital garbage heap. PeerGuardian on the other hand, is maintained by nobody at all. And should a new security hole ever come to light in the future, one can trust the Ubuntu devs to do their job. Otherwise they would have fixed those as well. If the Ubuntu devs lately mainly contribute what you call cosmetic changes to ufw, that only means that there were apparently no security holes to fix in it. Which means that its security is guaranteed by (in this case) the Ubuntu devs. ufw itself has a rather obsolete status in the Linux community and something that should be avoided.įirst of all, unlike the PeerGuardian crap, ufw is in the official repos. From now on, only one person "works" on the project, and basically only adds minor cosmetic changes such as minor corrections in the license, typos in the readme or minor fixes so that the code compiles on new machines. I say practically because the last commits contributing something to its development were added in 2018. Ufw itself is a solution that is practically not developed anymore. However, the Peerguardian that the author of the thread asked about is not a typical firewall or an AV. That is why I personally do not recommend using ufw or gufw - because in this matter we should care that the security we use is quite modern and actively developed, including actively patching errors and potential gaps.Īs a replacement that I personally recommend for home use - firewalld - something that is modern, actively developed, not compiled and fits well with virtually any Linux system Of which in recent months there have been a few cosmetic changes - such as translations or new profiles. Her code was actually last touched 5 years ago. The gufw overlay itself is also not particularly developed. ufw itself has a rather obsolete status in the Linux community and something that should be avoided. While in Linux we value security and up-to-date code, this may be a problem here.īecause the ufw itself is a solution that is practically not developed anymore. If we write off-topic, gufw is nothing more than a graphic overlay on ufw (gui made in gtk). I simply answered the question of the author of the thread. I'm not trying to convince anyone to install or not. You don't know how to do it? Don't write off topic. Apparently he has a good reason and wants to install it. The author of this thread asked how to install Peerguardian on Mint 21. Dear colleagues - most of your posts are simply off-topic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |